Upload your draft. In 5–8 minutes you get every weakness against your programme’s own criteria: where it is, the rule it breaks and how to fix it.
Upload the evaluation report you received: every evaluator comment explained, and a resubmission plan — free, by email.
Three short steps · about 60 seconds
PAYMENT CONFIRMED
We have emailed the complete report to the address you used for the review, with the PDF attached. It normally arrives within a minute.
We read your evaluation report and your proposal side by side: what each evaluator comment really means, where it sits in your proposal, why it cost you points, and whether it can be fixed in the text or needs a change to the project. Then the five changes that matter most for your next submission.
Not one pass over your document. Five, each answering a different question, with the answers reconciled against each other before anything is written.
Proposal, plus any annexes, budget or deck you want reconciled against it.
Routed to that programme’s own contract — criteria, thresholds, page limits, eligibility.
Excellence, Impact and Implementation assessed separately, so a strong section cannot mask a weak one.
Every claim checked against every other document you gave us. Contradictions surface here.
A three-page Fix Sheet and the full review, by email, as PDFs.
The six checks that most often decide an application before anyone scores it — written as things to do, not theory. In your inbox in a minute.
Start with a free preview — the number of issues found and two of them, by email. Then one payment per proposal unlocks the complete report, and if it gives you nothing worth acting on, you get it back.
Price depends on the programme.
Volume packages, 20–28% below retail.
Arranged by hand. There is no team account or credits shop yet — we set you up personally and invoice directly.
See package pricingConsultancies, grant offices and accelerators run the first pass on every draft in parallel, so their experts spend deadline week on the judgement calls. Volume packages are arranged by hand while this is a pilot.
They are good at prose. A review needs the programme’s own rules and your own evidence.
| A general chat assistant | GrantWise | |
|---|---|---|
| Rules | Generic “good proposal” advice | That call’s official criteria, thresholds and annex rules |
| Evidence | Opinions, rarely located | Every finding cites the section and page in your own text |
| Contradictions | Reads one document at a time | Reconciles proposal, budget, deck and annexes |
Qazi Sohail Ahmad — two decades writing and reviewing EU and national grant applications. The evaluator knowledge in this engine is his, written down and versioned rather than held in one person’s head.
GrantWise is small and says so. Packages are invoiced personally, support comes from the founder, and nothing here claims a team that does not exist.
Published only with permission.
A three-page Fix Sheet with the changes that matter most, and the full review behind it, as PDFs. Every finding quotes your text, names the rule it breaks and gives a correction with a model answer. We do not pad reports to reach a number.
The preview is free. The complete report is one payment: €50 for shorter applications (EIC Stage 1, Women TechEU, Innowwide, Oppstartstilskudd 1) and €150 for full dossiers (EIC Stage 2, EIC Transition, EIC Pathfinder, ERC Proof of Concept, Horizon Europe, Eurostars, Oppstartstilskudd 2, SkatteFUNN). You can pay straight away and receive the complete report at once, or preview first and unlock later. No account, no subscription, 14-day money back. Reviewing several a year? Volume packages start at €1,200.
The whole review runs on your draft, unpaid. You receive by email the number of issues found, how many are critical, and two of the findings in full — where each sits in your text, what an evaluator would object to, and the correction. The complete report is held for 7 days behind a private link; unlock it for the price above or let it expire, in which case it is deleted. The preview is limited to a couple per address per day.
No. It simulates how an evaluator reads against published criteria. It cannot predict a funding decision and it can be wrong — check every fact, deadline and eligibility statement against your official call.
Usually five to eight minutes; large dossiers take longer. You can close the tab — the report arrives by email.
Yes — that is the intended use. Fix the top corrections, upload again, and compare the two reports.
Processed in memory in the EU, never written to disk, never used for training. Only the generated report is kept, until it is delivered or the recovery window expires. Full privacy policy.
No. We do not ask you to waive your 14-day cooling-off period — change your mind within 14 days and you get a full refund.
Pay once, get the review in five to eight minutes, and a refund if it gives you nothing worth acting on.
Review my proposalREVIEW RUNNING
Typical time: 5–8 minutes. This is a multi-pass evaluation, not a chat reply — each criterion is audited separately, then reconciled.
Whether every impact claim has a named baseline, a measured value and stated test conditions — a frequent reason an Excellence score drops.
You can safely close this tab. Your complete review will be emailed to you as soon as it is ready.