You write these for a living
An independent adversarial pass before a draft goes to your client — a second opinion your client can see is not yours. Use it as internal QA, or share the Fix Sheet as part of your delivery.
You already know what a weak application looks like. What you do not have, the week before a deadline with five proposals open, is time to read each one adversarially against its own criteria. That is the job this does — consistently, in eight minutes, before it reaches your senior reviewer.
The mechanical audit is the part that does not need judgement, and the part that eats the most of it. Proportions below are illustrative of the shift, not a measured result.
Your reviewer does the audit and the argument in one sitting, usually late.
The audit arrives done. Your reviewer opens the file already knowing where to look.
Same engine, different bottleneck.
An independent adversarial pass before a draft goes to your client — a second opinion your client can see is not yours. Use it as internal QA, or share the Fix Sheet as part of your delivery.
One consistent standard across every department, so your research office spends its hours on the applications that actually need a human rather than on format checking.
Deadlines cluster, and so does the reviewing. A consistent first pass across an intake frees your advisers — and findings can reach them before the founder if you prefer.
Your judgement is what clients pay for. This is the mechanical layer underneath it.
Every proposal is audited against the same programme contract, in the same order, whoever is on it — so a finding traces to a named criterion and a location in the document, not to whose turn it was. We are measuring run-to-run repeatability on fixed test dossiers and will publish the number rather than assert it.
Five proposals in the last week is a resourcing problem. Running the first pass in parallel, in eight minutes each, turns it back into a reading problem.
You are the controller, we are your processor, and there is a signed DPA waiting — with a subprocessor list, transient EU processing and a no-training commitment. GrantWise does not retain uploaded proposals after processing.
A review is 1 credit for shorter applications (EIC Stage 1, Women TechEU, Innowwide, Oppstartstilskudd 1) and 3 credits for full dossiers (EIC Stage 2, EIC Transition, EIC Pathfinder, ERC Proof of Concept, Horizon Europe, Eurostars, Oppstartstilskudd 2, SkatteFUNN, the EIT KICs). Credits do not expire for 12 months. Retail is €50 and €150.
Credits, your branding on reports, priority handling and white-label are commitments we make to you and fulfil manually. There is no team account, credit balance screen or shared workspace to log into yet. That is the honest position, and it is why packages are invoiced directly rather than sold through checkout.
30 credits · about €40 per credit · 20% below retail
75 credits · about €36 per credit · 28% below retail
Annual, volume agreed with you
Packages are invoiced directly rather than sold through checkout — we are small, and we would rather set you up personally than build a credits shop before we know what you actually need. Tell us your volume below and we come back within one working day with an invoice and access. Bank transfer or card.
The service provides a consistent first-pass assessment, evidence ledger and correction plan. Your team remains responsible for eligibility, specialist facts and final advice to clients. We do not contact your clients, and nothing carries our brand if you do not want it to.