Skip to content
GrantWise
For consultancies and grant offices

Review more proposals without adding reviewers

You already know what a weak application looks like. What you do not have, the week before a deadline with five proposals open, is time to read each one adversarially against its own criteria. That is the job this does — consistently, in eight minutes, before it reaches your senior reviewer.

Where your reviewer’s time goes

The mechanical audit is the part that does not need judgement, and the part that eats the most of it. Proportions below are illustrative of the shift, not a measured result.

Today

Your reviewer does the audit and the argument in one sitting, usually late.

Mechanical checking Judgement and advice
  • Counting characters and checking annex formats
  • Reconciling the budget against the work plan by hand
  • Re-reading for the criterion nobody answered

With a first pass

The audit arrives done. Your reviewer opens the file already knowing where to look.

Mechanical checking Judgement and advice
  • Findings already located, with the criterion named
  • Cross-document contradictions surfaced before the read
  • Their time goes on the argument, which is what the client pays for

Three kinds of team use this

Same engine, different bottleneck.

Consultancies

You write these for a living

An independent adversarial pass before a draft goes to your client — a second opinion your client can see is not yours. Use it as internal QA, or share the Fix Sheet as part of your delivery.

Universities

You support many PIs at once

One consistent standard across every department, so your research office spends its hours on the applications that actually need a human rather than on format checking.

Accelerators

A cohort applies at once

Deadlines cluster, and so does the reviewing. A consistent first pass across an intake frees your advisers — and findings can reach them before the founder if you prefer.

What it changes in a practice

Your judgement is what clients pay for. This is the mechanical layer underneath it.

Consistent across reviewers

Every proposal is audited against the same programme contract, in the same order, whoever is on it — so a finding traces to a named criterion and a location in the document, not to whose turn it was. We are measuring run-to-run repeatability on fixed test dossiers and will publish the number rather than assert it.

Deadline weeks stop being a bottleneck

Five proposals in the last week is a resourcing problem. Running the first pass in parallel, in eight minutes each, turns it back into a reading problem.

Your clients’ documents are covered

You are the controller, we are your processor, and there is a signed DPA waiting — with a subprocessor list, transient EU processing and a no-training commitment. GrantWise does not retain uploaded proposals after processing.

Volume packages

A review is 1 credit for shorter applications (EIC Stage 1, Women TechEU, Innowwide, Oppstartstilskudd 1) and 3 credits for full dossiers (EIC Stage 2, EIC Transition, EIC Pathfinder, ERC Proof of Concept, Horizon Europe, Eurostars, Oppstartstilskudd 2, SkatteFUNN, the EIT KICs). Credits do not expire for 12 months. Retail is €50 and €150.

These are pilot packages, run by hand

Credits, your branding on reports, priority handling and white-label are commitments we make to you and fulfil manually. There is no team account, credit balance screen or shared workspace to log into yet. That is the honest position, and it is why packages are invoiced directly rather than sold through checkout.

Practice

€1,200

30 credits · about €40 per credit · 20% below retail

  • 10 full dossier reviews, or 30 short ones
  • Any mix of programmes
  • Signed DPA
  • Revision comparison on re-reviews
  • Email support, one working day
Most chosen

Firm

€2,700

75 credits · about €36 per credit · 28% below retail

  • 25 full dossier reviews, or 75 short ones
  • Everything in Practice, plus:
  • Your logo and organisation on every report
  • Named contact, not a shared inbox
  • Priority handling in deadline weeks
  • A say in which programme we build next

White-label

from €6,000/year

Annual, volume agreed with you

  • Branded review page under your domain
  • Your colours, logo, report identity and delivery email
  • Configured programme routes and report structure
  • Onboarding and configuration included
  • Direct commercial contact for changes

How buying works, honestly

Packages are invoiced directly rather than sold through checkout — we are small, and we would rather set you up personally than build a credits shop before we know what you actually need. Tell us your volume below and we come back within one working day with an invoice and access. Bank transfer or card.

Built to support experienced reviewers, not replace them

The service provides a consistent first-pass assessment, evidence ledger and correction plan. Your team remains responsible for eligibility, specialist facts and final advice to clients. We do not contact your clients, and nothing carries our brand if you do not want it to.

Start a package

A reply within one working day, from the founder, not a sales sequence. If you would rather test it first, buy a single review at the retail price — no package needed.