Built on two decades of expert EU proposal writing

See your proposal the way Brussels will — before you submit.

Upload your Horizon Europe or EIC Accelerator proposal. Our evaluation engine — built on expert skills gained over twenty years of writing and reviewing EU proposals — produces the Evaluation Summary Report you would receive from the Commission: official scoring descriptors, evaluator language, per-criterion scores, plus a ranked list of exactly what to fix. Delivered to your inbox.

1 · UPLOAD

Your Part B (PDF or DOCX) and the call you're applying to. No account needed.

2 · EVALUATED LIKE THE REAL THING

Scored 0–5 per criterion with the official descriptors, applying expert evaluation skills built over two decades in EU funding.

3 · EMAILED, THEN DELETED

The full report and corrections list arrive by email. Your proposal is deleted — we keep nothing.

Get your review

Drag your proposal here or browse

Why professionals trust it with their proposal

Deleted, not storedYour file is parsed in memory and never written to disk or a database. When the email is sent, nothing remains. The email says so, every time.
Processed in the EUEvaluation runs on EU-region infrastructure (europe-west1). Your text is never used to train any model.
Grounded in the real callWe won't guess your call. The evaluation is anchored to the Call ID or topic you provide — the same scope test real evaluators apply first.

Questions

What exactly do I receive?

A complete simulated Evaluation Summary Report — per-criterion scores on the official 0–5 scale with thresholds, evaluator-register narratives for Excellence, Impact and Implementation — plus a ranked corrections list: every finding converted into an actionable fix, worst first. EIC Accelerator uploads receive the EIC assessment format (qualitative verdicts, compliance sweep, investor-lens summary).

How accurate is the scoring?

The scoring engine derives scores from graded findings using the official descriptor ladder, and applies evaluation and drafting expertise built over two decades of professional EU proposal work. It reproduces how evaluators actually score — e.g. an excellent criterion still tolerates one minor finding, while a couple of unqualified shortcomings pull it to "very good".

How long does it take?

Typically 2–5 minutes for a full Part B. You can close the page after submitting — the review arrives by email.

Is this an official evaluation?

No. It is a simulation built to be format-faithful and calibration-faithful to official evaluations, so gaps surface before submission. It is not a European Commission assessment and does not predict funding decisions.

Can I get a re-review after fixing things?

Yes — fix the top corrections and upload the revised version. Comparing the two reports shows exactly how your score moved.